User Office
Alicja Górkiewicz
phone: +48 12 664 41 99
mobile phone: +48 571 445 045
e-mail: user.solaris@uj.edu.pl
https://duo.synchrotron.pl/
User Office
Alicja Górkiewicz
phone: +48 12 664 41 99
mobile phone: +48 571 445 045
e-mail: user.solaris@uj.edu.pl
https://duo.synchrotron.pl/
Please note that only those applications for which the outcome of the technical and safety evaluations have been positive will qualify for the substantive evaluation.
A* - Outstanding Proposal. The proposal is outstanding: well-written, involving innovative research into exciting science, the scientific case is compelling and the proposal is timely. A successful outcome would have a significant impact on the research field in question and beamtime will be allocated at the SOLARIS during the current proposal round.
A - Excellent Proposal. An excellent proposal which is complete, scientifically compelling and timely, and should be conducted at SOLARIS during the current proposal round.
B - Good Proposal. A good proposal with a relevant scientific basis which fully deserves beam time but is of lower priority in a competitive environment, or a potentially excellent proposal which is lacking some information, e.g. preliminary results, further explanations. In this case the Panel should specify the additional information required in the comment. Such proposals can be allocated according to beamtime availability based on a ranking list.
C - Sound Proposal. The proposal is based on a sound scientific basis but is considered scientifically less compelling or less timely than competing proposals, or the need for SOLARIS is not obvious.
X - Rejected Proposal. The proposal is technically or scientifically flawed and cannot be conducted, or the scientific case is not worthy of synchrotron time, or the scientific case cannot be evaluated due to poor writing of the proposal.